"Good" on Paper — But What Do People Experience? “There is no direct mechanism for care service users or carers to report concerns to the CQC — leaving a gap between lived experience and regulatory oversight.”
A recent inspection of adult social care concluded that the system is performing well. On paper, the picture is positive: strong leadership, good partnership working, and effective systems. But there is an important question: Does that reflect the experience of people who use services and carers day to day?
A different perspectiveThese inspections are designed to assess how well a system is organised and managed. They are not detailed investigations into individual cases or disputes. That means there can be a gap between:
how services are presented on paper, and
how they are experienced in practice
“These assessments rely heavily on council-provided evidence, so they often reflect how services are presented on paper — not always how they are experienced by people who use services and carers.”
How these reports are built CQC assessments are constructed from a combination of:
Council self-assessment and submitted material
Feedback from partners and stakeholders
Inspector review and analysis
This means the final report is shaped in large part by how the system is described — with independent findings adding context.
What the structure suggests A review of the report suggests that a substantial proportion reflects council-provided material, with independent findings forming a smaller part of the overall picture.
Estimated breakdown based on report structure and content analysis (not published CQC data).
From 260 pages of evidence — four key issues A detailed submission ahead of the inspection highlighted a number of consistent themes. These are not isolated points — but recurring patterns.
🔸 Direct Payments Raised: Practical restrictions and barriers affecting flexibility Reported: Flexible, empowering and easy to access 👉 Read more: Direct Payments — How It Works in Practice
🔸 Charging & Disability Costs Raised: Narrow interpretations and evidential barriers Reported: Clear, fair and transparent processes 👉 Read more: Charging and Disability Costs — How It Works in Practice
🔸 Complaints Raised: Difficulty progressing concerns and achieving resolution Reported: Responsive handling and learning 👉 Read more: Complaints Handling — How It Works in Practice
🔸 Safeguarding Raised: Concerns about how processes are applied Reported: Strong systems and effective oversight 👉 Read more: Safeguarding — How It Works in Practice
A missing pieceIt is not clear from the inspection process:
how concerns raised by people who use services and carers are assessed
how they are weighed against other evidence
or how they influence the final report
There is no transparent mechanism showing how such concerns feed into published conclusions.
Why this matters For people who rely on adult social care, reassurance must come from real experience — not just how a system is described.
“If you rely on the system, you don’t experience the policy — you experience the outcome.”
This is an independent website. It is not operated by Solihull Council or by any political party. It exists to help residents understand how Solihull Council works ahead of local elections.